RAOP

Curriculum

The RAOP curriculum follows a simulation-to-hardware learning progression grounded in Guided Inquiry-Based Learning (GIBL). Educators begin with guided digital-twin labs supported by starter MATLAB/Simulink models, guided questions, and short checklists that help participants run the activity, make small changes, and interpret what they observe. The on-site phase reinforces key concepts through hardware validation in the AVRC Laboratory. Across all platforms, the curriculum is designed to produce classroom-ready outputs: lesson materials, student deliverables, and aligned assessments that educators can implement and adapt in K–12 settings.

Platform Vendor and Technical Resources

RAOP uses Quanser platforms and the Quanser Academic Resources library to support the simulation-to-hardware workflow (digital twins + on-site validation). Quanser also provides documentation and support resources used during onboarding and program delivery.

Quanser logo

Structure

  • Two-week virtual phase (digital twins + guided labs)
  • One-week on-site phase (hardware validation in AVRC Lab)
  • Four groups per cohort, each focused on a platform strand

Instructional Model

  • Guided Inquiry-Based Learning (GIBL): educators investigate a guiding question using structured prompts and checkpoints.
  • Supported learning progression: clear steps, examples, and interpretation checks designed for participants who may be new to robotics or controls.
  • Evidence-centered work: record outputs, explain what the evidence shows, and connect results to classroom-ready activities.

Educator Outputs

  • Lesson plan aligned to a selected RAOP activity
  • Student-facing materials (prompts, tasks, deliverables)
  • Assessment plan (formative checks + summative rubric)
  • Implementation plan (resources, pacing, adaptations)

How GIBL Works in RAOP

Guided Inquiry-Based Learning (GIBL) means participants are not expected to “already know” robotics or control systems. Each activity begins with a clear goal and a guiding question. Educators use provided starter models, structured prompts, and short checklists to explore system behavior, test simple changes, and interpret results. The focus is on reasoning from evidence and translating the experience into a classroom-ready activity.

Start with a guiding question
Begin with a clear question (e.g., “What changes the response speed?”) and a short context review.
Use a supported workflow
Use starter files, checkpoints, and interpretation prompts to complete the lab steps and reduce guesswork.
Build classroom-ready outputs
Convert results into student prompts, expected observations, and a simple rubric aligned to learning goals.

Three-Week Learning Progression

The RAOP team selects a subset of modules for each cohort to match pacing, platform availability, and GIBL-aligned classroom translation goals. The plan below summarizes the intended progression across the virtual and on-site phases.

WeekFocusModalityExpected Deliverables
Week 1Onboarding + Core Concepts + First Guided LabsVirtual (Digital Twin)
  • Complete setup checks and access verification for required tools and materials
  • Finish guided introductory modules selected by the RAOP team
  • Begin a draft classroom translation plan (topic, grade band, constraints, learning goals)
Week 2Deeper Labs + Interpretation + Classroom TranslationVirtual (Digital Twin)
  • Complete additional selected modules (modeling/control/robotics workflows as applicable)
  • Document results and interpretations using provided lab procedures and prompts
  • Draft lesson plan components (objectives, student tasks, materials, pacing)
  • Draft assessment approach (formative checks + a summative rubric outline)
Week 3Hardware Validation + Implementation ReadinessOn-site (AVRC Lab Hardware)
  • Validate selected workflows on physical hardware with step-by-step support
  • Refine lesson plan and assessment materials based on validation outcomes
  • Finalize an implementation package (lesson plan + student materials + rubric + logistics)
Consistency across platforms
  • Selected activities use a common GIBL workflow: a guiding question, concept framing, structured prompts, lab procedure, and an assessment activity aligned to the lab outcomes.
  • Starter MATLAB/Simulink models are used in the virtual phase to support simulation, modeling/identification, and controller tuning where applicable.
  • On-site sessions emphasize validation, interpretation, and practical constraints that strengthen classroom translation.

Curriculum Strands

Each cohort is divided into four groups, with each group engaging one strand. All strands follow the same simulation-to-hardware progression and contribute to the educator’s final classroom-ready materials.

No prior robotics or controls background is required. Activities are designed with clear supports so educators can participate confidently and adapt materials for their own classrooms.

Controls Foundations (Qube-Servo 3)
Core control concepts grounded in measurement, modeling, stability, and feedback design. Participants build intuition in virtual labs and then validate key results on hardware during the on-site week.
Representative learning targets
  • Instrumentation and data collection (hardware interfacing, filtering)
  • System modeling (step response, parameter estimation, block-diagram modeling, and/or frequency response)
  • Stability analysis (experimental and analytical)
  • Controller design and tuning (P/PD concepts, performance criteria, qualitative tuning, and basic control design)
Dynamics and Attitude Control (Aero 2)
Rotational dynamics, parameter estimation, filtering, and control design delivered via a simulation-to-hardware workflow using guided MATLAB/Simulink models and structured interpretation prompts.
Representative learning targets
  • Instrumentation and data collection (hardware interfacing)
  • Measurement and filtering
  • Block-diagram modeling, parameter estimation, and model validation
  • Controller design and tuning (PID concepts, performance criteria, qualitative tuning, and design)
Manipulation and Sensing (QArm)
Manipulation fundamentals and sensing concepts through structured tasks that translate naturally into classroom demonstrations and student activities. Work begins in digital twins and is reinforced with on-site hardware.
Representative learning targets
  • Sensing and feedback concepts for manipulation tasks
  • Kinematics concepts and motion planning intuition (workspace identification, lead through, teach pendant)
  • Pick-and-place workflows and task decomposition (trajectory generation)
  • Visual manipulation activities (image acquisition, object detection, introduction to visual servoing)
Ground Autonomy and Navigation (QBot Platform)
Mobile robotics foundations using guided activities that emphasize sensing, observation, and navigation-oriented applications. Digital-twin work supports classroom transfer and on-site validation.
Representative learning targets
  • Hardware interfacing
  • Perception sensor overview (depth camera vs LiDAR—capabilities and limitations)
  • Forward and inverse kinematics intuition
  • Line following and object detection applications

Follow RAOP

Updates, announcements, and participant highlights.

Official RAOP social channels. Additional platforms will be added as they launch.